Over at A Slip of a Girl’s blog, another post on just whether the garters go over or under the panties. Not only do I completely agree with Slip in terms of what is the classic or appropriate placement of classic lingerie pieces, but my opinions are deeply rooted in eroticism.
Those posting their dissent do so in terms of discussing accessing panties — or beyond. They talk of ease, but they forget the tease.
Yes, removal of one’s panties is a much slower affair when they are bound by the elastic bars of garters; but what equals the deliciously
slow
process
of a woman releasing each garter, one by one,
slowly tugging her panties down over stockings and heels,
stepping neatly out of each panty leg –
Before she begins to once gain attach each garter to her stockings?
If a Master insists upon quick access, he simply orders no panties at all. But, if he wants to enjoy a teasing show, he’ll order the remove those panties under his appraising, admiring, and lingering gaze…
(Hey, it’s called lingerie because you’re supposed to linger, not rush!)
If you still need convincing, how about watching Sophia Loren strip tease in Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow
…
Let me tell you from experience, no matter how familiar you are with your lover, no matter how adept and experienced your fingers are, being ordered to strip out of your delicate dainties sends your fingertips — and more — to quivering.
So, the pornification of panties over the garter belt isn’t merely a pity as far as aesthetics go, but a damn shame in terms of anticipation.
All of this may seem contradictory to my slut-ish nature; but I assure you, I was a tease long before I was a submissive girl. I know whereof I speak.
Image via Flickr.
Tags: lingerie, lipstick submissives (tm), serving, stockings, vintage
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by SlipOfAGirl, Pinkie. Pinkie said: Blog: Impatience Vs. Anticipation: Lingerie http://bit.ly/dfhaLU [...]